De mogelijke gevolgen van abortus

– complicaties

– psychisch

– maatschappij 

Complicaties

Abortus kan soms complicaties met zich meebrengen.

Complicaties abortus provocatus in Nederland, volgens WAZ rapportages:

2016 – 658 vrouwen

716 complicaties – meerdere mogelijk **

2017 –  785 vrouwen

805 complicaties – meerdere mogelijk

2018 – 705 vrouwen

722 complicaties – meerdere mogelijk*

*

haemorrhage profuse or prolonged

bloedverlies > 1/2 liter 147

incomplete abortus 384

letsel aan uterus 21

infectie 13

** bij abortus procedures in een ziekenhuis kregen 12% van de vrouwen complicaties

In een eerdere WAZ rapportage stond dat 80% van de complicaties in een abortuskliniek, door de kliniek zelf werden behandeld (zie afbeelding).

In een krantenartikel vertelde een aborteur dat ze ooit maar 1 persoon naar het ziekenhuis had gestuurd, maar vertelde er dus niet bij dat zij in-house de problemen oplossen meestal.

https://www.volkskrant.nl/kijkverder/v/2020/abortus-is-de-keuze-van-een-vrouw-wij-faciliteren-dat~v396222/

Maar wat als de vrouw pas een paar dagen later klachen krijgt die zo erg zijn, en ze hulp moet zoeken?

Ik had ook complicaties na mijn abortus, maar ‘no way’ wilde ik nog contact met de abortuskliniek – het was een zeer traumatische ervaring geweest.

En wat als men via de huisarts pillen zal krijgen in de toekomst… dan is er geen zicht op complicaties, want als je naar een EHBO post gaat, is nog maar de vraag of ze weten dat een abortus voorafging….. zie volgend blokje Dr Berning…

Eerdere jaren:

The number of complications listed in the WAZ report over 2010[2] was 322, while there were 466 in 2012[3], an increase of some 44%.

In 2012 there were around 150 incomplete abortions (for example, a foot left inside womb, or remains of placenta), with 24 women having a damaged uterus. 379 women were treated in the local facility for their complications, while 41 women were referred to a hospital for further treatment.

Besides extreme blood loss of over ½ liter (125 cases), infection and medication side effects (35 cases), along with the aforementioned damaged uterus and incomplete abortions, there were around 130 other complications not further specified. They no longer report separately a torn cervix (which they did in 2010). The reporting has not been standardized throughout the years.

Press statement Dr Berning:

Complications are underreported.

1. The operative note says “ruptured ectopic pregnancy and internal hemmorrhage” – but the real cause is abortion.

2. The autopsy states “cause of death: overwhelming sepsis” – the real cause is abortion.

3. The medical diagnosis is “severe pain” – the real cause is abortion.

4. The record reads “vaginal bleeding” – the real cause is abortion.

https://afterabortion.org/abortionists-are-not-held-accountable-for-mistakes/

What exactly do you mean: safe?

The word “safe” is actually a cloudy term, and actually means they want it “legal”.

Abortion can affect the woman, her family, but also society. An example: more premature births in pregnancies that follow. The 2009 Dr Prakesh Shah systematic review meta analysis study reported that women with exactly 1 prior induced abortion have 36% higher odds of a preterm birth compared to women with zero induced abortions. Women with more than 1 induced abortion have 93% higher odds of a ‘preemie’ delivery. So, in a country in which women without induced abortions have a 10% premature birth rate, women with more than one prior induced abortion would have an absolute ‘preemie’ risk of 19.3% (1.93 x 10%).
Reference Shah PS, Zao J. Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG [British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology] 2009;116:1425-1442 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02278.x/pdf

Yet it is touted as ‘safe’.

Premature babies under 37 weeks gestation have an elevated risk of [MACE] mental retardation, autism, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, deafness, blindness, lung impairment, and serious infections, costing governments billions in healthcare. There are other studies for example Swingle, and a study from
McGill University, which found that, on average, women who had one prior induced abortion were 45% more likely to have premature births by 32 weeks, 71% more likely to have premature births by 28 weeks, and 117% more likely to have premature births by 26 weeks.

Even in the Netherlands, Van Ankum of the AMC Academic Hospital is cited as saying: “One fifth of the women who have undergone a curettage suffer from adhesions. The chance of a premature birth at the next pregnancy also increases. The differences were impressive: the chance of a birth
earlier than 37 weeks increases by 30%, that of a birth earlier than 32 weeks even by 70%.”

https://mediator.zonmw.nl/mediator-28-april-2018/ik-hoop-dat-het-aantal-curettages-afneemt/
(the same operation for miscarriage or abortion).

‘Cost Consequences of Induced Abortion as an Attributable Risk for Preterm Birth and Impact on Informed Consent’ concludes “Induced abortion contributes to significantly increased neonatal health costs by causing 31.5% of early preterm births.”

Who will pay the tab of all the weeks hospitalization of babies needing to be in neo-natal units in hospitals?

Psychisch

Maatschappij